Quoting%20commentary for Eruvin 92:1
ורב פפא אמר איצטריך ס"ד אמינא הני מילי בעירובי חצירות אבל בעירובי תחומין אימא לא צריכא
R.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' So MS.M. and Ban. Cur. edd. begin with 'and'. Now in view of this established difference the question (supra p. 319) remains: Wherefore were the two statements required?');"><sup>1</sup></span> Papa replied: It<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' The statement of R. Jacob b. Idi in the name of R. Johanan that 'the halachah is in agreement with R. Johanan b. Nuri' (supra 46a) .');"><sup>2</sup></span> was required:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Though R. Joshua b. Levi also laid down the general rule that 'the halachah is in agreement with the authority that maintains the less restrictive ruling in respect of the laws of 'erub' (loc. cit.) .');"><sup>3</sup></span>
Explore quoting%20commentary for Eruvin 92:1. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.